I-Circle Forum

1. 母語教學 =>
2. 新高中 334 =>
3. 通識 =>
4. 小學分班 =>
玩完

中小學生已被玩殘，好快連大學生都被下毒手

334 同通識好重要

bananasims 寫:334 同通識好重要

但係.....講真......真係驚通識變左另外一科死背書既科.........我見而家既Form4係咁教==比本教科書佢讀(密麻麻的data==)......
通識係重要.....但係要睇下點樣教同點樣教......
第二屆白老鼠自歎倒霉......

教育產業化…好快就到大學生

到時真係自求多福了！

而家 A-Level 都係有通識
我聽啲大學師姐話通識根本無得死背

根本你分析能力同跟大路思維就 A，偏激、特殊、不道德咁作答就好易肥。

無聊一問:為何文法中學要學吃飯?

I am a 334 student.
LS is really difficult...

szehim2009 寫:I am a 334 student.
LS is really difficult...

讀咗咁耐書，讀書邊會易…
無咗個 A-Level 咪偷笑，好似 ECON 咁樣 334 90% 係 CE
10% 係 A-Level，仲要係無最難嗰啲 Indifference Curve Analysis，得返啲 MUV、Production & Cost Functions

其他，我記得數學，老師講過要讀咩進階課程先有微積分，雖則難過 CE A.Maths，不過都去到 M&S level

咁易仲想點

bananasims 寫:

szehim2009 寫:I am a 334 student.
LS is really difficult...

無讀書係易…

其實 334 ECON 90% 係 CE 野

I study Phy, Bio, Chem.
In the exam, I did worst in LS
But I can still afford most of the subjects at the moment.

szehim2009 寫:

bananasims 寫:

szehim2009 寫:I am a 334 student.
LS is really difficult...

無讀書係易…

其實 334 ECON 90% 係 CE 野

I study Phy, Bio, Chem.
In the exam, I did worst in LS
But I can still afford most of the subjects at the moment.

之前個回覆未打好

bananasims 寫:

szehim2009 寫:

bananasims 寫:

szehim2009 寫:I am a 334 student.
LS is really difficult...

無讀書係易…

其實 334 ECON 90% 係 CE 野

I study Phy, Bio, Chem.
In the exam, I did worst in LS
But I can still afford most of the subjects at the moment.

之前個回覆未打好

I agree with you. However, I insist that we didn't get enough preparation in F1-F3.
I mean, my school didn't teach enough knowledge to us while we were in junior form.
So, perhaps we will need to study harder to catch up with the new syllabus, or TRY catch up with the old one.

邊方面？
我舊制 F3 -> F4 無問題
不過 F5 -> F6 係真係好大轉變

bananasims 寫:邊方面？
我舊制 F3 -> F4 無問題
不過 F5 -> F6 係真係好大轉變

I guess Sci, in the new syllabus, something that should be taught in F1-F3 were not taught/ taught in F4

咁唔知
我 PHY CHEM BIO HISTORY 喺 Form 3 都係學咗半年

bananasims 寫:咁唔知
我 PHY CHEM BIO HISTORY 喺 Form 3 都係學咗半年

Anyway, I just feel that I didn't learn much/enough in F1-F3, something important is missing and this makes 334 learning progress slower than the old syllabus

bananasims 寫:根本你分析能力同跟大路思維就 A，偏激、特殊、不道德咁作答就好易肥。

思維同化 → http://tinyurl.com/cjvbax

玩＿完

bananasims 寫:而家 A-Level 都係有通識
我聽啲大學師姐話通識根本無得死背

根本你分析能力同跟大路思維就 A，偏激、特殊、不道德咁作答就好易肥。

食慒咗？
中化夠係要求分析力強啦，咪又係個個走去背

順便回帶，陶傑試做通識卷
http://bit.ly/5qlav6
http://bit.ly/4LaVar

唔好潛水呀

大大師兄 寫:

bananasims 寫:而家 A-Level 都係有通識
我聽啲大學師姐話通識根本無得死背

根本你分析能力同跟大路思維就 A，偏激、特殊、不道德咁作答就好易肥。

食慒咗？
中化夠係要求分析力強啦，咪又係個個走去背

順便回帶，陶傑試做通識卷
http://bit.ly/5qlav6
http://bit.ly/4LaVar

唔好潛水呀

通識，miss/sir 要你答 open-ended questions，但實際上答嘅時候又係要用返一堆 terms 去用一個「啤膠式」諗法去答問題，如果唔係就炒。
咁實際上出黎高分嘅人都係「啤膠」出黎嘅高分低能，仲話叫「通識」？




得嘅，呢個都係通識，不過係中式嘅通識。

佢話就話「言之成理」，其實係預先 set 咗一系列同意嘅原因，及不同意嘅原因，當你同意 / 不同意嘅時候，所講嘅理據同佢 set 定嘅 match 嘅話，就有分，請問呢啲係咪叫「言之成理即可」？