http://yuuji.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/metroserect28/
Do anyone know what is this talking about? It seemed that mentioned something about MTR, but can anyone tell me what it exactly saying?
UCR683 寫:解譯:
因為將軍澳線是參照港島線的路線設計建造而成,但路線多彎令 M-Train 列車行車時發出大噪音,故設下多段限速區(TSR),欲減低噪音。
K-Train 所用的行車電腦與牽引系統,在將軍澳線用ATO行駛,多段限速區會令列車再生制動系統失效。
故2010年中 K-Train 回將軍澳線營運時,要取消限速區(因為K-Train車廂隔音效果較佳),改用手動按信號駕駛。
UCR683 寫:ICOCA:
It is beacause this is a railway corporation's internal and classified truth.
ICOCA 寫:By the way, can anyone explain for me that the details of the bottom part about "Technical Problem" the writer was talking. And anyone know the progress of Northern Island Line.
Thanks
UCR683 寫:ICOCA 寫:By the way, can anyone explain for me that the details of the bottom part about "Technical Problem" the writer was talking. And anyone know the progress of Northern Island Line.
Thanks
The K-Train in TKO Line uses plug doors rather than slide doors, so the door closing time is slightly longer than M-Train.
The progress of Northern Island Line: Stay tuned for a decade year.
Here are my guesses:
- The construction of High Speed Rail and Shatin-Central Link consumes lots of SAR government's capital, and no need more for Northern Island Line as a burden.
- MTR should spend billions of money, for renovation of rolling stocks (Except the new arrival C-Stocks), changing formation of East Rail Line Trains and its signaling system.
ICOCA 寫:I have heard about that MTR will conduct resignaling work after the SCL work begins. Most likely they will adopt a radio base moving block signaling. However I would wonder why NIL could not be finished because of the loading gauge. Do MTR have different loading gauge for different route.
UCR683 寫:The K-Train in TKO Line uses plug doors rather than slide doors, so the door closing time is slightly longer than M-Train.
hkmtrhah 寫:UCR683 寫:The K-Train in TKO Line uses plug doors rather than slide doors, so the door closing time is slightly longer than M-Train.
Actually, the K-Train can use a shorter delay (or no delay) before completely closing doors, just like A-Train. However, since it caused too many accidents like finger caught in a door, the technicians tuned the delay for longer to prevent accident happens again. (But it's really funny as Tung Chung Line uses plug doors train when the line opened(1998), before TKL opened, but there was no report for the same thing.)
ICOCA 寫:hkmtrhah 寫:UCR683 寫:The K-Train in TKO Line uses plug doors rather than slide doors, so the door closing time is slightly longer than M-Train.
Actually, the K-Train can use a shorter delay (or no delay) before completely closing doors, just like A-Train. However, since it caused too many accidents like finger caught in a door, the technicians tuned the delay for longer to prevent accident happens again. (But it's really funny as Tung Chung Line uses plug doors train when the line opened(1998), before TKL opened, but there was no report for the same thing.)
so that we have no way to deal with Hundreds of thousands of delay everyday?
hkmtrhah 寫:ICOCA 寫:hkmtrhah 寫:UCR683 寫:The K-Train in TKO Line uses plug doors rather than slide doors, so the door closing time is slightly longer than M-Train.
Actually, the K-Train can use a shorter delay (or no delay) before completely closing doors, just like A-Train. However, since it caused too many accidents like finger caught in a door, the technicians tuned the delay for longer to prevent accident happens again. (But it's really funny as Tung Chung Line uses plug doors train when the line opened(1998), before TKL opened, but there was no report for the same thing.)
so that we have no way to deal with Hundreds of thousands of delay everyday?
Not going to deal as we just take it as a minor technical problem. The delay has also been included in the dwell time, so there's (nearly) no "arriving late".
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 37 位訪客