廣深港高鐵

[hang]

唉唉唉!!!好心成熟D得唔得呀
唔係唔俾你反,但唔該遵守返法律,你咁做只會令人反感

有人將呢D咁的行為美化為公民抗命，呢D事陸遂有來

[大大師兄]

唉唉唉!!!好心成熟D得唔得呀
唔係唔俾你反,但唔該遵守返法律,你咁做只會令人反感

有人將呢D咁的行為美化為公民抗命，呢D事陸遂有來

公民抗命邊有咁低 b 㗎

[jimmy_lam]

唉唉唉!!!好心成熟D得唔得呀
唔係唔俾你反,但唔該遵守返法律,你咁做只會令人反感

有人將呢D咁的行為美化為公民抗命，呢D事陸遂有來

公民抗命邊有咁低 b 㗎

公民抗命要坐喺度比人拉,唔會反抗

[hkmtrhah]

唉唉唉!!!好心成熟D得唔得呀
唔係唔俾你反,但唔該遵守返法律,你咁做只會令人反感

有人將呢D咁的行為美化為公民抗命，呢D事陸遂有來

公民抗命邊有咁低 b 㗎

公民抗命要坐喺度比人拉,唔會反抗

我見到有 BB 喊 [sosad]

[a252]

they are simply making things even worse as they can not convince people to support if they use too extreme action..
Honestly, I don't actually care whatever they build the HSR(High-Speed Railway) or not only if they decide to improve the transport network at the terminal as the TCL have too few trains and they are mostly fulfill with passenger and damage the first image at Hong Kong transport from the tourist from oversea.
The station at the Shek Kong is simply a waste of money as it is only next to the barrack and the miltary airfield. It is close to inaccessable to the public who travel with public transport and it sounds more reasonable to be a emergency platform for people to get off at emergency situation or also get closer to the west rail station..

[bananasims]

they are simply making things even worse as they can not convince people to support if they use too extreme action..
Honestly, I don't actually care whatever they build the HSR(High-Speed Railway) or not only if they decide to improve the transport network at the terminal as the TCL have too few trains and they are mostly fulfill with passenger and damage the first image at Hong Kong transport from the tourist from oversea.
The station at the Shek Kong is simply a waste of money as it is only next to the barrack and the miltary airfield. It is close to inaccessable to the public who travel with public transport and it sounds more reasonable to be a emergency platform for people to get off at emergency situation or also get closer to the west rail station..

非常贊同
嗰班人仲話錦上路比西九有更高可達性…

[a252]

they are simply making things even worse as they can not convince people to support if they use too extreme action..
Honestly, I don't actually care whatever they build the HSR(High-Speed Railway) or not only if they decide to improve the transport network at the terminal as the TCL have too few trains and they are mostly fulfill with passenger and damage the first image at Hong Kong transport from the tourist from oversea.
The station at the Shek Kong is simply a waste of money as it is only next to the barrack and the miltary airfield. It is close to inaccessable to the public who travel with public transport and it sounds more reasonable to be a emergency platform for people to get off at emergency situation or also get closer to the west rail station..

非常贊同
嗰班人仲話錦上路比西九有更高可達性…

The poor people are mostly located at northwest NT and they are most likely unable to afford the price of HSR and it will lead to lack of passenger travel by HSR.
it is very clear that 錦上路 is far too remote to the CBD and it the west rail does not have enough carriage to afford the increased amount of passenger of HSR and it will produce a chain effect to people who live next to the west rail and tehy will protest about it.

[V813]

The poor people are mostly located at northwest NT and they are most likely unable to afford the price of HSR and it will lead to lack of passenger travel by HSR.
it is very clear that 錦上路 is far too remote to the CBD and it the west rail does not have enough carriage to afford the increased amount of passenger of HSR and it will produce a chain effect to people who live next to the west rail and tehy will protest about it.

相信西鐵線的容量限制正是某專家組建議「港島快線」的一大原因。
不過港島快線的可行性就是另一回事啦

[bananasims]

The poor people are mostly located at northwest NT and they are most likely unable to afford the price of HSR and it will lead to lack of passenger travel by HSR.
it is very clear that 錦上路 is far too remote to the CBD and it the west rail does not have enough carriage to afford the increased amount of passenger of HSR and it will produce a chain effect to people who live next to the west rail and tehy will protest about it.

相信西鐵線的容量限制正是某專家組建議「港島快線」的一大原因。
不過港島快線的可行性就是另一回事啦

原來你係 V813
佢地自知錦上路方案可達性唔高，不過又唔想比政府威返陣，所以就整條唔湯唔水既港島快綫
其實佢唔講條港島快綫，淨係講優化西鐵，而家唔會惹黎咁多爭拗

[CRH3C]

人地今日仲話政府方案引致西九擠塞
原來錦上路唔會塞(或者系真, 因為無人用 )

[CRH3C]

反高鐵網民港鐵站貼800標語
(明報)2009年12月12日 星期六 05:10

【明報專訊】8名年輕男女透過facebook聯絡，自發印製2000張寫有「一人一萬，倒貼高鐵，富豪得益，你有排蝕」的反高鐵貼紙，昨日分頭沿著荔枝角至太子4個港鐵站車廂、幕門、扶手電梯等地方張貼達800張貼紙，呼籲市民於今月18日一起包圍立法會 ，其間一名青年被職員發現擒住及報警，最後被登記資料後放行。

被擒住後放行

港鐵發言人指出，根據港鐵附例第32條，任何人未經批准在港鐵處所張貼廣告、傳單 等，最高可被判罰款5000元及監禁3個月。發言人指，已經向該青年發出違反附例的通知書，並將事件交由法律部門研究，保留追究權利。

被擒的黃冠豪事後表示，由於高鐵造價高達600多億元，全港市民平均約分擔達1萬元，極不合理，「如果建成後不賺錢，可能會在其他路線加票價，最終貼錢的又是香港市民！」故他與同伴自發印製了2000張「反高鐵」貼紙，早前在facebook聯絡後，共8名年青男女於昨午開始沿荔枝角至太子4個港鐵站張貼，「希望有更多人站出來」。

市民主動索貼紙鼓勵

8人分散行動，在多個車廂、幕門、扶手電梯及出入口張貼了約800張貼紙。阿豪說，其間有市民不明原委，他們便上前解釋，亦有支持他們的市民主動索取貼紙以示鼓勵。

港鐵指出，昨午5時半發現阿豪張貼貼紙，一名便衣職員上前將其截停。阿豪表示，當時不知道對方身分，故曾作反抗。同伴出閘離開後向記者表示，阿豪遭近20名增援的職員拉扯。警方其後亦到場了解，表示無人受傷。阿豪被帶入太子站辦公室警告及登記資料後放行。一名同行女子表示，事發時港鐵職員不斷增援，又開咪捉拿其他張貼者，但7人成功返回地面。她說張貼行動會繼續，稍候將商量剩下約1200張貼紙在何處張貼。

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/091211/4/fm08.html

唉唉唉!!!好心成熟D得唔得呀
唔係唔俾你反,但唔該遵守返法律,你咁做只會令人反感

既然要公民抗命, 仲乜咁怕死要走佬?
仲要留低一個咁無義氣?

講到底, 假激進真怕死

[KeroChu]

不如你去試下派，你卑D職員鬧完你唔走兼且繼續派我就贊你勁！！！

[大大師兄]

嗰班「專業」唔識回歸西鐵 + 北環線共用方案已經冇乜嘢好講，依家洗濕個頭啦

[kirisame]

1997年,香港回歸中國
1997年,國內第一次提速,開辦京滬之間的夕發朝至卧鋪列車

2009年,香港討論廣深港高鐵港段,有人指出卧鋪不如飛機方便
2009年,全球最快卧鋪列車CRH2E投入服務,京滬之間開辦卧鋪動車

原來個班香港人思維已比大陸落後12年!

十二年前,京滬之間開辦夕發朝至卧鋪,至今已成為商務人士首選.原因很簡單,卧鋪比早班/夜班飛機方便!
以京滬D321班次來講,9時15分由上海市中心浦東出發,7時32分,抵達位於東城區的北京站,離天安門不到3公里.如果8時由市中心出發,抵達也快得12時,還得多住一晚酒店!如果希望早上7時抵達北京,卻必須深夜3時出發,可惜3時至4時并沒有航班前往北京!

近來航空公司最近開辦"京滬"空中快線,仍未能搶鐵路市場!有報導更指,飛機有兩大致命傷-機場接駁交通與惡劣天氣影響,對直特卧鋪幾乎無影響!你并沒有看錯,是z班次列車,即京港直通車同級,并未影響CRH!

飛機比火車更方便..........
佢地比大陸人更落後啊!
(唔好意思,轉自我個blog,廢事轉口語)

[b_kevin_e]

財委會經兩小時辯論至正式討論高鐵撥款 18.12.2009 18:30
立法會財委會正討論廣深港高速鐵路工程的六百七十億元撥款申請，在正式討論撥款申請前，財委會用了兩個多小時辯論公民黨湯家驊出的動議，他要求財委會先中止審議撥款，等政府先聘請獨立專家，研究公共專業聯盟建議的高鐵走線方案，日後至討論撥款。動議結果以27票反對，23票贊成，被否決。而梁國雄跟著提出可能有議員於鐵路事宜小組討論時，無申報利益，或會引致不公平，要求中止審議撥款，亦以三十票對二十一票被否決。在辯論湯家驊的動議時，泛民議員贊成，但民建聯陳鑑林指湯家華想盡辦法拖延會議，他又指責社民連陳偉業拖延程序，如同玩泥沙，雙方一度對罵。立法會鐵路小組主席自由黨劉健儀，就認為議員不應在財委會浪費時間。

http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsde ... mId=185739

又係班泛民左Q住哂
而家泛民係我印象已經破哂產

[UCR683]

日本早在1960年代已有「寢台新幹線」的構想；內地於今年實現了！

[大大師兄]

財委會經兩小時辯論至正式討論高鐵撥款 18.12.2009 18:30
立法會財委會正討論廣深港高速鐵路工程的六百七十億元撥款申請，在正式討論撥款申請前，財委會用了兩個多小時辯論公民黨湯家驊出的動議，他要求財委會先中止審議撥款，等政府先聘請獨立專家，研究公共專業聯盟建議的高鐵走線方案，日後至討論撥款。動議結果以27票反對，23票贊成，被否決。而梁國雄跟著提出可能有議員於鐵路事宜小組討論時，無申報利益，或會引致不公平，要求中止審議撥款，亦以三十票對二十一票被否決。在辯論湯家驊的動議時，泛民議員贊成，但民建聯陳鑑林指湯家華想盡辦法拖延會議，他又指責社民連陳偉業拖延程序，如同玩泥沙，雙方一度對罵。立法會鐵路小組主席自由黨劉健儀，就認為議員不應在財委會浪費時間。

http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsde ... mId=185739

又係班泛民左Q住哂
而家泛民係我印象已經破哂產

http://news.sina.com.hk/cgi-bin/nw/show.cgi/3/1/1/1365905/1.html

財委會主席劉慧卿諮詢議員意見後決定押後表決。此時，民建聯葉國謙也提出押後表決﹕「反正傾不完啦！」但會議日期仍需與政府商討。

睇清楚先啦

[kirisame]

財委會經兩小時辯論至正式討論高鐵撥款 18.12.2009 18:30
立法會財委會正討論廣深港高速鐵路工程的六百七十億元撥款申請，在正式討論撥款申請前，財委會用了兩個多小時辯論公民黨湯家驊出的動議，他要求財委會先中止審議撥款，等政府先聘請獨立專家，研究公共專業聯盟建議的高鐵走線方案，日後至討論撥款。動議結果以27票反對，23票贊成，被否決。而梁國雄跟著提出可能有議員於鐵路事宜小組討論時，無申報利益，或會引致不公平，要求中止審議撥款，亦以三十票對二十一票被否決。在辯論湯家驊的動議時，泛民議員贊成，但民建聯陳鑑林指湯家華想盡辦法拖延會議，他又指責社民連陳偉業拖延程序，如同玩泥沙，雙方一度對罵。立法會鐵路小組主席自由黨劉健儀，就認為議員不應在財委會浪費時間。

http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsde ... mId=185739

又係班泛民左Q住哂
而家泛民係我印象已經破哂產

http://news.sina.com.hk/cgi-bin/nw/show.cgi/3/1/1/1365905/1.html

財委會主席劉慧卿諮詢議員意見後決定押後表決。此時，民建聯葉國謙也提出押後表決﹕「反正傾不完啦！」但會議日期仍需與政府商討。

睇清楚先啦

真係比班泛民左住曬

尋日睇住佢直播,泛民真係係咁鬧係咁拖...........

[大大師兄]

財委會經兩小時辯論至正式討論高鐵撥款 18.12.2009 18:30
立法會財委會正討論廣深港高速鐵路工程的六百七十億元撥款申請，在正式討論撥款申請前，財委會用了兩個多小時辯論公民黨湯家驊出的動議，他要求財委會先中止審議撥款，等政府先聘請獨立專家，研究公共專業聯盟建議的高鐵走線方案，日後至討論撥款。動議結果以27票反對，23票贊成，被否決。而梁國雄跟著提出可能有議員於鐵路事宜小組討論時，無申報利益，或會引致不公平，要求中止審議撥款，亦以三十票對二十一票被否決。在辯論湯家驊的動議時，泛民議員贊成，但民建聯陳鑑林指湯家華想盡辦法拖延會議，他又指責社民連陳偉業拖延程序，如同玩泥沙，雙方一度對罵。立法會鐵路小組主席自由黨劉健儀，就認為議員不應在財委會浪費時間。

http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsde ... mId=185739

又係班泛民左Q住哂
而家泛民係我印象已經破哂產

http://news.sina.com.hk/cgi-bin/nw/show.cgi/3/1/1/1365905/1.html

財委會主席劉慧卿諮詢議員意見後決定押後表決。此時，民建聯葉國謙也提出押後表決﹕「反正傾不完啦！」但會議日期仍需與政府商討。

睇清楚先啦

真係比班泛民左住曬

尋日睇住佢直播,泛民真係係咁鬧係咁拖...........

係咁拖拖拖拖拖拖拖都還好，否決咗就大擠

[kirisame]

其實唔知係未班泛民怕同大陸融合?
雖然大陸政府我都驚
但你香港係地區經濟體咋wo.........你唔靠大陸好難做
特別e+大陸個餅大